Bencana Kabut Asap: Pandangan dan Sikap Non Govermental Organization
Main Article Content
Abstract
This studi aims to expose framing in Social Movement from two Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) in facing haze disater in Indonesia that happens in Sumatera and Kalimantan. Method uses is qualitative descriptive by collecting data from book literatures, news and online news as secondary data. The result shows that each NGO has different thought about smog disaster. Greenpeace tends to view the haze disaster from the ecologys aspect; smog disaster as a product of deforestation that should be handle by Government. Meanwhile, Wahana Lingkungan Hidup (Walhi) tends to view haze disaster will affect to the social community. In the other hand, World Wide Fund (WWF) and Borneo Orangutan Survival tends to view haze disaster from different perspective that is non human species. Although each NGO has different position in order to view haze disaster, those NGO are connected to two activities form, that are campaign and advocacy. For example, campaign, will invite society to join in the protect paradise movement. While in advocacy, Greenpeace, Walhi and WWF urged and supported the Government of Indonesia to find the perpetrators of the forest fires that ended up in the haze disaster.
Article Details
References
Anggreta, Dian Kurnia. 2015. “Masyarakat Powerless Dan Derita Kerusakan Lingkungan.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Mamangan 4 (2): 144–50. https://doi.org/10.22202/mamangan.v4i2.1309
Chen, Jiaoyan, Huajun Chen, Guozhou Zheng, Jeff Z Pan, Honghan Wu, and Ningyu Zhang. 2014. “Big Smog Meets Web Science: Smog Disaster Analysis Based on Social Media and Device Data on the Web.” In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, 505–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2576941
Feng, Haiyan, and Qiyan Zhang. 2018. “Legitimization Communication Tactics of Environmental NGOs in China: A Case Study of Greenpeace.” Global Media Journal 16 (31): 1–9. https://www.globalmediajournal.com/open-access/legitimization-communication-tactics-of-environmental-ngos-in-china-a-case-study-of-greenpeace.pdf
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. “Selections from the Prison Notebooks (Q. Hoare & GN Smith, Trans.).” New York: International Publishers.
Nainggolan, Poltak Partogi. 2013. “Kapitalisme Internasional Dan Fenomena Penjarahan Lahan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Politica Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri Dan Hubungan Internasional 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.22212/jp.v4i2.324
Pinem, Tanda. 2016. “Kebakaran Hutan Dan Lahan Gambut: Kajian Teologi Ekofeminisme.” GEMA TEOLOGIKA: Jurnal Teologi Kontekstual Dan Filsafat Keilahian 1 (2): 139–66. https://doi.org/10.21460/gema.2016.12.219
Satz, Ani. 2009. “Animals as Vulnerable Subjects: Beyond Interest Convergence.” Hierarchy and Property Animal Law 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/da.206
Sommaliagustina, Desi. 2017. “Asap: Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan yang Tumpul Terhadap Korporasi Wilayah Titik Api Di Indonesia.” JOURNAL EQUITABLE 2 (1): 114–37. https://ejurnal.umri.ac.id/index.php/JEQ/article/view/820/532
Suryani, Anih Sri. 2012. “Penanganan Asap Kabut Akibat Kebakaran Hutan Di Wilayah Perbatasan Indonesia.” Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial 3 (1): 59–75. https://jurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/aspirasi/article/view/256
Watson, Robert T, Marufu C Zinyowera, and Richard H Moss. 1996. Climate Change 1995. Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses. UK: Cambridge University Press.