Dilema Aliansi Keamanan Korea Selatan-Amerika Serikat: Studi kasus penempatan THAAD di Korea Selatan

Main Article Content

Nadya Elvira

Abstract

The research conducted as following below purposed to provide the explaination behind South Korea's rational decision in conducting the Three No's Policy agreement with Tiongkok as an effort to achieve normalization of relations between the two countries after the boycott of the entry of South Korean products into China because of China's rejection of the cooperation of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) between South Korea and the United States. This research is analyzed using a conceptual framework called Rational Actor Model. Based on Graham T. Allison, Rational Actor Model is divided into four main indicators that is being considered during taking a decision, which are Goals and Objectives, Alternatives, Consequences, and Choice. This research analyze South Korea's rational reasons for approving the policy through a literature study using the four elements described by Allison above. According to the Rational Actor Model itself, this research found that the economic factor is the main reason why South Korea finally decided to take the Three No's Policy agreement moreover considering the entire boycott towards South Korea's products that is being done by Tiongkok beforehand. This research found that South Korea's reason for agreeing to Three No’s Policy regarding the issue of a boycott by China against South Korea was due to economic factors. Although also confronted with alternatives regarding security policies, maintaining relations with China is more rational for South Korea because of the large economic interests of South Korea towards China. That is because China is the main trading partner and the biggest market for South Korea.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

A, Mintz dan Karl DeRouen Jr. 2012. “The Rational Actor Model” Understanding Foreign Policy Decision Making, hal.57.
Abrahamuan, Andray, dan Daekwon Son, “Moving On: China Resolves THAAD Dispute With South Korea” diakses melalui https://www.38north.org/2017/11/abrahamianson110917/
AFP, “N Korean nuclear test condemned as intolerable provocation” Indian Express, 6 Januari 2016, diakses melalui https://indianexpress.com/article/world/world-news/n-korean-nuclear-test-condemned-as-intolerable-provocation/ pada 10 Maret 2020
Berlinger, Joshua. “North Korea casts shadow as Trump and Moon meet for first time” CNN, 29 Juni 2017, diakses melalui https://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/28/asia/south-korea-moon-jae-in-donald-trump-meeting/index.html pada 10 Maret 2020
China Daily, “THAAD may lead to $7.5b economic loss in 2017: South Korean media” 20 September 2017, diakses melalui chinadaily.com.cn/world/2017-09/20/content_32245052.htm pada 16 Februari 2020
Cho, Jeniffer. “Turning Out the Lights?: The Impact of THAAD on Hallyu Exports to China”, Korea Economic Institute of America 한미 경제 연구소, diakses melalui http://keia.org/turning-out-lights-impact-thaad-hallyu-exports-china pada 18 Desember 2019
Chosun, “중국이사드를두려워하는진짜이유는? (The true reason why the China is afraid of THAAD)”,diakses melalui http://pub.chosun.com/client/news/viw.asp?cate=C01&mcate=M1005&nNewsNumb=20160319738&nidx=19739 pada 10 Januari 2019
Deede, Sara Elizabeth. 2010. “Activism and Identity: How Korea’s Independence Movement Shaped the Korean Immigrant Experience in America, 1905-1945”, Dissertations and Theses, Portland State University, hal.1.
EFE, “Beijing, Seoul to strengthen ties despite differences over THAAD” 31 Oktober 2017, diakses melalui https://www.efe.com/efe/english/world/china-to-oppose-thaad-despite-mending-ties-with-south-korea/50000262-3424279 pada 28 Februari 2020
Eun, Kim Ji. 2010. Korean Wave In China: It,s Impact On The South Korean-Chinese Relations, Vancouver: University of British Columbia, hal 19.
Ferrier, Kyle. “Just How Dependent is South Korea on Trade with China” Korea Economic Institue of Amerika, diakses melalui http://keia.org/just-how-dependent-south-korea-trade-china pada 20 Februari 2020
Harris, Bryan, Song Jung-a, Sherry Fei Ju, dan Tom Hancock, “China bans tour groups to South Korea as defence spat worsens”, Financial Times, 3 Maret 2017, diakses melalui https://www.ft.com/content/9fc4b1b4-ffb1-11e6-96f8-3700c5664d30 pada 18 Desember 2019
Heung-kyu Kim, 2017. China and the U.S.-ROK Alliance: Promoting a Trilateral Dialogue, hal.1.
Hornby, Lucy. “South Korea’s Moon Jae-in calls for ‘new era’ in China relations”, Financial Times, 14 Desember 201, diakses melalui https://www.ft.com/content/d7ea5874-e0ba-11e7-a8a4-0a1e63a52f9c pada 28 Februari 2020
Jang, Soo Hyun. 2012. “The Korean Wave and Its Implications for the Korea-China Relationship”, Journal of International and Area Studies, hal.98.
Judson, Jen. “THAAD To Officially Deploy to South Korea” 7 Juli 2016, diakses melalui http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/2016/07/07/thaad-officially-deploy-southkorea/86837806/; pada 10 November 2019.
Jun, Hannah. 2017. “Hallyu at a Crossroad: The Clash of Korea’s Soft Power Succes and China’s Hard Power Threat in Light of Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) System Deployment” dalam Asian International Studies Review Vol. 18. No. 1. Hal 163
Kafle, Tulasi R. 2011. “Making a Difference: Allison’s Three Models of Foreign Policy Analysis”, hal.3.
Kim, Cyntia dan Hyunjoo Jin, “With China dream shattered over missile land deal, Lotte faces costly overhaul” Reuters, 25 Oktober 2017, diakses melalui https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lotte-china-analysis/with-china-dream-shattered-over-missile-land-deal-lotte-faces-costly-overhaul-idUSKBN1CT35Y pada 18 Desember 2019.
Kim, Inwook & Soul Park, 2018. “Deterrence under nuclear asymmetry: THAAD and the prospects for missile defense on the Korean peninsula”, dalam Contemporary Security Policy, hal.5.
Meick, Ethan dan Nargiza Salidjanova, 2017. “China’s Response to U.S.-South Korean Missile Defense System Deployment and its Implications” hal.6.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, “Diplomatic White Paper 2016”
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, “Diplomatic White Paper 2018”
Permata, I. M. (2019). Analisis Konstruktivisme: Perilaku Korea Utara terhadap Denuklirisasi. Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS), 8(2), 109-110.
Sankara, Jaganath dan Bryan L. Fearey. 2017. Missile defense and strategic stability: Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) in South Korea., Contemporary Security Policy, hal.4.
U.S Departmen of State, “ U.S. Relations With the Republic of Korea” 17 Juli 2018, diakses melalui state.gov/u-s-relations-with-the-republic-of-korea/ pada tanggal 27 November 2019
Yonhap News Agency, “S. Korea Selects golf course as new site for THAAD” diakses melalui https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20160930004900315 pada 12 November 2019.
Yonhap News, “Most Lotte hypermarkets in China still remain shut over THAAD backlash” diakses melalui https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20180216002000320 pada 18 Desember 2019