EFEKTIVITAS PEMBENTUKAN ASEAN INSTITUTE FOR PEACE AND RECONCILIATION DALAM MENANGANI KONFLIK DI KAWASAN ASIA TENGGARA

Main Article Content

Novriest Umbu Walangara Nau Jet Sahertian

Abstract

Various conflicts that occurred in the Southeast Asian region made ASEAN respond quickly. This is realized through the establishment of the ASEAN Institute for Peace and Reconciliation which carries out several functions including research, capacity building, development in expertise, networking, gathering experiences and ASEAN best practices on peace, conflict management and conflict resolution, and post-conflict peace building. However, until now there are still various conflicts that occur. Therefore, this study aims to present the results of an analysis of organizational reporting. To gain a more comprehensive understanding, the researcher uses the theory of Regime Effectiveness and the concept of international regimes. In addition, this study uses a qualitative method with a qualitative descriptive type. This study finds that the organization is not effective in dealing with conflicts in Southeast Asia because the organization is not empowered in conflict resolution efforts, in addition to the application of the ASEAN Way principle and the lack of support from member countries.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Aida, Nur Rohmi. 2021. "Kudeta Myanmar, Sebab, dan Apa yang Sebenarnya Terjadi?" Tren, 02 12.
ASEAN. 1997. "The Founding of ASEAN." History, 08 08.
Azwar, Asrudin. 2020. "Konflik di Laut China Selatan." Opini, 07 03.
Centre, South. 2007. The ASEAN Experience: Insights for Regional Political Cooperation . Geneva: South Centre.
Galtung, Johan. 1996. Peace By Peaceful Means. London: SAGE Publications.
IPR, ASEAN -. 2019. Annual Report. Digital Annual Report, Jakarta Selatan: ASEAN - IPR.
Irfansyah, Fadhila. 2019. "Institusi Internasional sebagai Representasi Individu: Faktor Ketidakefektifan ASEAN Institute for Peace and Reconciliation Dalam Mekanisme Penyelesaian Konflik di Asia Tenggara." Journal of International Relations 807-809.
Keohane, Robert O. 1998. International Institutions: Two Approaches. US: Harvard University: International Studies Quarterly.
Krasner, Stephen D. 1982. "Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables." International Organization.
Lederach, John Paul. 1999. Building Peace : SUSTAINABLE RECONCILIATION IN DIVIDED SOCIETIES. Washington D.C: United States Institute Of Peace Press .
Mayer, Bernard. 2012. "The Dynamics of Conflict : A Guide to Engagement and Intervention Second Edition." In The Dynamics of Conflict : A Guide to Engagement and Intervention Second Edition, by Bernard Mayer, 25. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass.
Mitchell, C. R. 1981. The Structure of International Conflict. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, London : THE MACMILLAN PRESS LTD.
Secretariat, ASEAN. 2008. The ASEAN Charter. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
Semiawan, Prof. Dr. Conny R. 2010. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Shafira, P. 2014. "ASEAN dan ASEAN Way." MBP Asia Tenggara, 04 16.
Suastha, Riva Dessthania. 2018. "RI Harapkan ASEAN Bisa Redam Konflik Lewat Badan Rekonsiliasi." Asean, 02 01.
—. 2018. "RI Harapkan ASEAN Bisa Redam Konflik Lewat Badan Rekonsiliasi." Asean, 02 01.
—. 2017. "Marzuki Darusman Paparkan Sumber Konflik Rohingya ." Berita Asean, 10 02.
Suryabrata, Sumadi. 1983. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: CV. Rajawali.
VOA. 2017. "Pertempuran Melawan Militan Muslim di Marawi, 13 Marinir Filipina Tewas." Asia Pasifik, 06 10.
Zurich, ETH. 2010. ""There's No Way Like the ASEAN Way"." International Relations and Security Network 02.