Upaya Negara Dalam Mencapai Keamanan Energi. Studi Kasus: Transformasi Kebijakan Energi Korea Selatan

Main Article Content

Ardila Putri

Abstract

The export-based development policy launched by South Korea after the end of the Korean war caused the country to rely heavily on energy sources for their development goals. This ultimately encourages South Korea to continue transforming its energy policy in accordance with the situation and conditions experienced by the country. This paper analyzes South Korea's energy transition since its establishment to the present day using the multi-level perspective. The transition process was analyzed from the relationship between the existing regime and innovation opportunities in the wider environment. Data was collected through official South Korean government documents, websites, also supported by journals and news articles. This study concludes that the government remains the dominant actor at the meso level in any energy policy transition. As for the micro level, there are differences in innovation opportunities according to the conditions in that era. In addition, energy transitions are also caused by different situation in each period at the macro level.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Boo, Kyung-Jin. Energy Policy Experiments: Lessons from the Korean Experience. Diakses dari https://development.asia/case-study/energy-policy-experiments-lessons-korean-experience
Chen, Wei Ming. Hana Kim & Hideka Yamaguchi. Renewable energy in eastern Asia: Renewable energy policy review and comparative SWOT analysis for promoting renewable energy in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Energy Policy. Volume 74, November 2014, Pages 319-329
Geels, Frank W. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. Volume 1, Issue 1, June 2011, Pages 24-40
Hesary, Farhad Taghizadehy, ed. 2019. Achieving Energy Security in Asia. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute
Kent E. Calder. 2005. Korea’s Energy Insecurities Comparative And Regional Perspectives. Korea Economic Institute. Washington
Korea Resources Economics Association (KREA). 2013. 2012 Modularization of Korea’s Development Experience: Energy Policies. Ministry of Strategy and Finance, Republic of Korea
Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy. 2014. Korea Energy Master Plan. Outlooks and Policies to 2035.
Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy. 2019. A New Energy Paradigm for the Future Third Energy Master Plan
Putri, A, Silvia D.A, Radika A. Keberhasilan Bantuan Luar Negeri di Asia Timur Laut: Sebuah Pembelajaran Bagi Negara Berkembang. Andalas Journal of International Studies, Vol IX No 1 May 2020
Scholvin, Soren & Joachim Betz. 2019. Energy Policy in the Emerging Economies. Lanham: Lexingtons Books
Se Hyun Ahn. Republic of Korea's Energy Security Conundrum: The Problems of Energy Mix and EnergyDiplomacy Deadlock. Journal of International and Area Studies, Vol. 22, No. 2 (December 2015), pp. 67-87
Sung Hyun Kim, Tae Heon Kim, Youngduk Kim, In-Gang Na. Korean energy demand in the new millenium: outlook and policy implications, 2000-2005. Energy Policy 29 (2001) 899-910
Verbong, Geert & Frank Geels. The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy 35 (2007) 1025–1037
Yun, Sun-Jin & Jung, Yeon-Mi. Energy Policy at a Crossroads in the Republic of Korea. Friedriech Ebert Stiftung, 2017