The Interest of the United States in North Korea's Denuclearization Process

Main Article Content

Javira Ardiani

Abstract

The United States is a country that seeks to realize denuclearization in Korean Peninsula. Though the United States is not a party that will be directly threatened because the United States have more stronger nuclear capability than North Korea’s nuclear. This study aims to describe the interests of the United States as a Status Quo State in the process of denuclearization of North Korea. The conceptual framework used by this study is Randall L. Schweller's Range of State Interest concept. This research uses a qualitative research method with descriptive analytical research that uses secondary data. Based on the concept of Range of State Interest, this research found that the United States as a 'Lion' country has an interest in maximizing security which includes maintaining its identity as a nuclear possession country, maintaining trade with East Asian countries, and improving governmental functions. Whereas in maintaining its position, the United States has an interest in maintaining its alliance with South Korea and Japan, maintaining prestige for world peace, and realizing CVID (Complete, Verifiable, and Irreversible Dismantlement) or full denuclearization.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Aldikawati, Mega. "Dinamika Hubungan Korea Utara-Korea Selatan dan Dampaknya terhadap stabilitas Keamanan di Kawasan Asia Timur Pasca Perang Dingin." Reunifikasi Korea, 2012: 42-46.

Amanda, Meidy. "Dilema Aliansi Amerika Serikat terkait Peningkatan Kapabilitas Militer Jepang." Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (Universitas Indonesia) 1 (2018): 159-169.

BBC News Indonesia. Kim-Trump tandatangani ‘kesepakatan’ : Hubungan AS-Korut akan berbeda sama sekali. Diakses dari https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/amp/dunia-44447915 pada januari 2019

BBC Indonesia. “Nuklir Korut :Korsel latihan Rudal, AS ancam ‘pembalasan militer besar-besaran”. 4 September 2017. Diaksesdarihttps://www.bbc.com/amp/dunia-41144846pada 10 desember 2019.

CNN Indonesia.“ResponNuklir Korea Utara, AS Ancam Aksi Militer Skala Besar”. 4 September 2017. Diaksesdarihttps://m.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/201709033233257-113-239201/respon-nuklir-korea-utara-as-ancam-militer-skala-besarpada 1 Desember 2019

Davidson, Chase O. Neoclassical Realism and The Collapse of the 1994 Agreed Framework. Iowa State University, 2008.

Dewitasari, Windhy. Strategi Penangkalan Nuklir Korea Utara Periode 2003-2010. Universitas Indonesia, 2011.

Gray, Sarah. “These are the Biggest U.S. Trading Partners”. 7 Maret 2018.Diaksesdarihttps://www.fortune.com/2018/03/07/biggest-us-trade-partners/amp/pada 15 Desember 2019

Hwang, Jihwan. "Realism and U.S Foreign Policy toward North Korea." World Affairs (167), 2004: 15-29.

Izharruddin, Thufeil. Pengaruh Kebijakan Amerika Serikat di Semenanjung Korea dalam Proses Reunifikasi Korea (2011-2013). Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, 2016.

Jhonston, Alastair Lain. "Is china a Status Quo Power?" International Security (Harvard College and MIT Press) 27 (2003): 5-56.

Jim Mattis. "National Defense Strategy of The United States of America". Departemen Pertahanan Amerika Serikat. 2018.

Kamasa, Fransminggi. Perang Korea. Pustaka Narasi. 2014

Kim, Min Hyung. "Why Provoke the Sno-US Competition in East Asia and North Korea's Strategic Choice". Journal of Strategic Studies. 2015:1-20

LeBlanc, Paul dan Zachary Cohen. “Senate Democrats Urge Diplomatic Action Against North Korea As Trump Downplay Tests”. CNN Politics. 6 September 2019. Diaksesdarihttps://amp.cnn.com/2019/09/06/poitics/democrats-north-korea-trump-denuclearization-un/index.htmlpada 15 Desember 2019

Lim, Hee Jea. Korea is Really Matter to U.S.? The Relationship about USFK and ROK-U.S. Alliance. Halmstad University, 2011.

Lind, Jennifer M. "Pacifism or Passing The Buck". Internatioanl Security. MIT Press. 2004.

Logan, Justin. "China, America, and Pivot to Asia." Policy Analysis (CATO Institute), 2013: 1-27.

Marpaung, Edward Giovanny. Aliansi Militer Amerika Serikat dan Korea Selatan dalam Upaya Menjaga Stabilitas Keamanan Semenanjung Korea (2010-2016). Bandung: Universitas Komputer Indonesia, 2017.

Mearshimer, Jhon. "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics". New York: W. Warton
Company. Hlm. 157-158

Nabil, Muhammad. "Diplomasi Six Party Talks dalam Proses Denuklirisasi Korea Utara Periode 2003-2009." Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 2014.

Permata, Inda Mustika. "Analisis Konstruktivisme : Perilaku Korea Utara terhadap Denuklirisasi." Andalas Journal of International Studies 2 (2018): 104-116.

Rantung, Krisandhy Ertanto. Kebijakan Luar Negeri Amerika Serikat terhadap Program Pengembangan Nuklir Korea Utara pada Masa pemerintahan Barrack Obama. Bandung: Universitas Komputer Indonesia, 2016.


Schweller, Randall L. "Bandwagoning for Profit : Bringing the Revisionist State Back in." International Security, 1994: 72-107.

Schweller, Randall L. "Neorealism's Status Quo Bias : What Security Dilemma? ." Security Studies (Ohio State university), 1996: 90-121.

Schweller, Randall L. "Unanswered Threats : a Neoclasical Realist Theory of Underbalancing." International Security (MIT Press) 29 (2004): 159-201.

Secretary of Defense. "Defense Budget Overview". United States Departement of Defense Fiscal. 2019

SIPRI. SIPRI Yearbook 2019: Armaments, Disarmament, and International Security Summary. Yearbook, Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute , 2019.

Syahrin, M Najeri Al. "Logika Dilema Keamanan Asia Timur dan Rasionalitas Pengembangan Senjata Nuklir Korea Utara." Journal of International Studies, 2018: 116-135.

Xu, Beina. "The China-North Korea Relationship." CFR Journal, 2014: 1-6.

Yeo, Andrew. "U.S. Military Base Realignment in South Korea." Peace Review (Taylor&Francis Group), 2010: 113-120.

Zelikow, Philip. How Diplomacy with North Korea can Work.(2018)